Ho Chi Minh, the enemy of the United States in the Vietnam War, was initially a friend. He worked with U.S. special forces in rescuing downed American airmen and. Free expressions, words, phrases origins and derivations, original meanings and explanations of words and expressions roots and sources. Dragon Age Origins Free Download Full Version RG Mechanics Repack PC Game In Direct Download Links. This Game Is Cracked And Highly Compressed Game.Campus Free Speech Crisis | National Review. What’s gone wrong on our college campuses and how can we fix it? This past week, Manhattan Institute scholar Heather Mac Donald, a knowledgeable supporter of America’s criminal justice system and thoughtful critic of the Black Lives Matter movement, was repeatedly shouted down by protesters at UCLA, then silenced and forced to escape with a police escort the next day, during what should have been her talk at Claremont Mc. Kenna College. These incidents follow the February riot that forced the cancellation of a Milo Yiannopoulos talk at UC Berkeley, and the March shout- down at Middlebury College of conservative Charles Murray, followed by the violent attack that sent Murray’s liberal interlocutor, Professor Allison Stanger, to the hospital. The immediate lesson of the UCLA shout- down and the Claremont shut- down is that widespread condemnation by all sides of the Berkeley and Middlebury incidents has not restored campus free speech. Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Crime and Criminal Law » Probation and Parole: History, Goals, and Decision. Ethan Thomas is the main protagonist of the Condemned video games and first appeared in Condemned: Criminal Origins as a Metro City detective working for the SCU. Criminal law: The body of law that defines criminal offenses, regulates the apprehension, charging, and trial of suspected persons, and fixes penalties and modes of. On the contrary, America’s colleges continue their descent into low- grade anarchy. Why is that? The immediate explanation is that leftist college students are furious at the election of Donald Trump as president. Yet often- illiberal demonstrations swept over the nation’s campuses during the 2. Trump became a factor. The crisis of free speech has also been aggravated by a rising tide of shout- downs and disruptions of pro- Israel speakers since 2. Before that, I reported in 2. In fact, I began covering campus silencing incidents for NRO in 2. I wrote about angry UC Berkeley students storming the offices of the Daily Californian to destroy a run of papers containing a David Horowitz ad opposing reparations for slavery. Today’s problems are hardly new. Back in 2. 00. 1, as reported by ABC News, thefts of campus newspapers had increased by 6. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, anti- preferences activist Ward Connerly, and Second Amendment supporter Charlton Heston were often disrupted or canceled. Here is a very partial excerpt from David Horowitz’s description of his reception at various campuses in the early 2. I once had to terminate a talk prematurely despite the presence of thirty armed police and four bodyguards at Berkeley. I had to be protected by twelve armed police and a German Shepard at the University of Michigan. I was rushed by clearly deranged individuals and saved only by the intervention of a bodyguard, twice — at M. I. T. and Princeton.” (Sixteen years later, Horowitz has become the latest example of a campus free speech shut- down.). A San Francisco Chroniclearticle from 2. Berkeley in which 2. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The incident was publicly condemned in a column by Berkeley mayor Shirley Dean and condemned as well in a joint letter by several members of the original Berkeley Free Speech Movement. These interventions by prestigious voices on the left were fueled by “cumulative frustration over several years of leftist demonstrations, particularly at the UC campus, disrupting speeches of those they view as criminal in one form or another.” Targets of UC Berkeley disruptions stretching from the mid 1. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, and former NATO commander General Wesley Clark. The first in this series of UC Berkeley speaker disruptions of the post- 1. Ronald Reagan’s United Nations ambassador, Jeane Kirkpatrick, by hecklers opposed to U. S. policy in El Salvador. Although her words were drowned out, Kirkpatrick went through the motions of reading her talk. Her follow- up Berkeley lecture was canceled, however. This incident, at a time when shout- downs were rare, sparked a national discussion and broad condemnation. Yet far from this condemnation preventing further disruptions, the virus quickly spread. Kirkpatrick was shouted down two weeks later at the University of Minnesota and her scheduled 1. Smith was canceled. The current era of campus shout- downs, shut- downs, and disinvitations had arrived. Yet the origins of this era lay still further back in time. The campus disruptions of the 1. Most important for our purposes, Yale’s Woodward Report of 1. Yale would need to break. What the Woodward Report called Yale’s “failures” began in 1. President Kingman Brewster, “in the interest of law and order” and in deference to New Haven’s black community, canceled a scheduled talk by segregationist Alabama governor George C. Wallace at the height of the Civil Rights struggle. Keep in mind that the report’s chairman, Yale historian C. Vann Woodward, had advised Thurgood Marshall’s legal team as it argued for school desegregation in what became the Brown vs. Board of Education decision of 1. And Woodward’s book, The Strange Case of Jim Crow, had been dubbed “the historical bible of the civil rights movement” by Martin Luther King Jr. Yet this Civil Rights hero, along with other liberal faculty members at Yale, pressured President Brewster to defend the freedom of speakers such as George Wallace. None of this is to deny that the problem of campus shout- downs and disinvitations is getting worse. Yet it’s important to keep in mind that today’s pattern is an intensification of a long- standing crisis that has had its ups and downs since the early Sixties, but has not fundamentally changed in form for well over five decades. What’s clear after 5. Let’s see why. We can think of the challenges to free- speech since the Sixties as washing over our campuses in four great waves. The first wave (“Young Radicals”) was made up of the illiberal and violent Sixties student radicals. Notwithstanding the views of the Free Speech Movement veterans who condemned the Berkeley Netanyahu shut- down of 2. Sixties radicals rejected classical- liberal conceptions of freedom in favor of a neo- Marxist analysis. In this view, free speech and constitutional democracy are tools used by the ruling class to suppress dissent and protect an oppressive society. The second anti–free- speech wave (“Long March”) hit colleges in the early- to- mid 1. These faculty did away with required Western Civilization courses as well, helping to launch the academic “culture war” that began at Stanford in 1. After allied leftist faculty and students succeeded in abolishing Stanford’s Western Civilization requirement in 1. Western Civilization debate). The third anti–free- speech wave (“Takeover”) began in the mid 1. At this point, the younger and more radical generation of faculty members reached critical mass. That is, they had the numbers to control hiring. Not believing in the classical- liberal vision of a marketplace of ideas, these faculty used the tenure system, not to seek out and protect the finest scholarly representatives of diverse perspectives, but to solidify an intellectual monopoly of the Left. By the 2. 00. 0s, the tenured radicals constituted a controlling majority in many social science and humanities departments, and stood as the most powerful plurality in the university as a whole. The fourth anti–free- speech wave (“Transformed Generation”) consists of the late Millennial students who began demanding safe- spaces and trigger warnings around 2. Free- speech advocate Gregg Lukianoff and social psychologist Jonathan Haidt attribute the new student sensitivities, in part, to parental coddling by the Baby Boomers. No doubt there is truth to this, but this college generation’s K–1. Although Lynne Cheney, former National Endowment for the Humanities chairwoman under Presidents Reagan and George H. W. Bush, managed to convince the U. S. Senate to condemn the proposed new multiculturalist National History Standards of 1. Sixties generation of K–1. The rest of the curriculum was also quickly remodeled along lines that stressed group conflict and America’s sins. The generation that brought us “micro- aggressions” and “white privilege” duly entered college 2. The key to solving the campus free- speech crisis lies in the decade- long interregnum between the radical Sixties and the kick- off of the campus culture wars in the mid 1. This was also a period of relative calm in the country as a whole. The widely praised Woodward Report of 1. Young Radicals phase (wave one), and ushered in the decade- long restoration of campus free speech. That restoration ended with the Jeane Kirkpatrick shout- down at Berkeley in 1. What distinguished the Woodward Report of 1. Berkeley’s response to the Kirkpatrick shout- down of 1. The Woodward Report not only eloquently upheld the principle of free speech, it insisted that students who shouted down visiting speakers must be disciplined. The Woodward Report also established a sanctions policy, and a system for warning disruptive students of potential disciplinary consequences. This approach carried the day at Yale and elsewhere during the post- Sixties restoration of free speech. In effect, the Woodward Report and its positive national reception helped return the credible threat of discipline for speaker shout- downs that had been abandoned by craven administrators during the 1. A decade after the Woodward Report, things changed. While the Berkeley faculty as a whole condemned the students who shouted down Jeane Kirkpatrick in 1. Kirkpatrick’s hecklers punished was defeated. This was likely a concession to the many junior faculty who openly defended Kirkpatrick’s disruptors on the grounds that “oppressors” have no free- speech rights. Although many observers felt that disciplinary action against Kirkpatrick’s hecklers had to be taken, the UC Board of Regents also declined to follow up on a demand for discipline initiated by Regents’ chairman Glenn Campbell. Meanwhile, UC Berkeley chancellor Ira Heyman indicated that no disciplinary action would be taken. With more leftist faculty streaming in over succeeding years, those who favored discipline for disruptors grew less powerful. The days when even (or especially) liberal Civil Rights heroes understood the need to grant free speech to segregationists were over. Nike's "Just Do It" Slogan History. The work between Nike and advertising agency Wieden + Kennedy is arguably as legendary as the products and lifestyle that they present to consumers. While the origins of the name “Nike” trace back to ancient Greece, their usage of the slogan “Just Do It” has a much more sinister and recent connotation. For our latest #HSTBT, we explore the murderer whose condemned words sparked an advertising revolution. In many ways, a good slogan and a condemned man’s last words are a lot alike. They read crisp and to the point, snap against the eardrum like a rum pum pum from a snare drum, and there’s an honesty about them. Yet, rarely if ever is there an intersection. When Nike faced a period in the late ’8. Nike CEO Phil Knight – who notoriously was against advertising ploys – knew that they needed something to energize the company. Little did anyone know that their legendary slogan “Just Do It” – which would be used for the first time in a television capacity – would come from a 1. Utah. In a recent interview with Dezeen, Dan Wieden of legendary Portland advertising agency Wieden+Kennedy spoke of the root of the “Just Do It” campaign. It was the first television campaign we’d done with some money behind, so we actually came up with five different 3. Wieden said. “The night before I got a little concerned because there were five different teams working, so there wasn’t an overlying sensibility to them all. Some were funny, some were solemn. So I thought you know, we need a tagline to pull this stuff together, which we didn’t really believe in at the time but I just felt it was going to be too fragmented. So I stayed up that night before and I think I wrote about four or five ideas. I narrowed it down to the last one, which was ‘Just do it.’ The reason I did that one was funny because I was recalling a man in Portland.”“The Man in Portland” – government name Gary Gilmore – did spend time in Portland, but he bounced around the entire Western United States before he, his three brothers, and parents settled in The City of Roses in 1. During his formative years, Gilmore’s boyish hijinks escalated from petty theft to being the mastermind of a grand theft auto ring when he was only 1. After the court/law finally caught up with him, he was sent to the Mac. Laren Reform School for Boys in Oregon for a year. Undeterred by the consequences of a life of crime, Gilmore graduated to the Oregon State Correctional Institution on another charge of grand theft auto where he spent a year behind bars and lost his father to terminal lung cancer while he was still incarcerated. Between 1. 96. 2 and 1. Gilmore was arrested on an array of charges – each time upping the ante and becoming increasingly more violent. After being moved from Portland to federal prison in Marion, Illinois, he would once again be paroled. It’s unknown why Gilmore was in Utah on the night of July 1. Portland or merely getting as far West as he could on his strained financial resources – but that night would be the end of Gilmore as a “petty criminal” and merely “The Man in Portland” who had a reputation for taking things that weren’t his. It was a Monday. Gilmore was out for a drive in Orem, Utah with the sister of his current girlfriend. They pulled into a self- service gas station at 1. Max Jensen was working his usual shift at the Sinclair self- service station. Whether Gilmore had planned it or was prone to fits of crime when the opportunity presented itself, the fact that the station was empty save for Jensen meant trouble wasn’t percolating, it was already scalding- coffee hot. Gilmore produced a 2. Browning Automatic and instructed Jensen to empty his pockets. After doing so, he was shoved into a bathroom and told to lay down with his arms under his body. Jensen did everything he was told to. According to the Clark County prosecutor, Gilmore put the gun close to Jensen’s head [and said] ‘This one is for me,'” before firing. The following night, Gilmore entered the City Center Motel in Provo, Utah which was under the watch of Ben Bushnell who lived there with his wife and baby. He shot Bushnell in the head – retreating with the cash box but also being seen by Bushnell’s wife. Outside, Gilmore accidentally shot himself with his own gun. By Wednesday, Gilmore’s cousin, Brenda Nicol, turned him into the police. Gilmore gave up near a roadblock without a fight. By October 7, 1. 97. Gilmore had been convicted for the death of Bushnell and sentenced to death after only a day of both deliberating as to his guilt or innocence, as well as the punishment he should receive. At the time, Utah had two methods for execution: hanging and firing squad. Gilmore chose death by firing squad, saying, “I’d prefer to be shot.” If executed, Gilmore would become the first person in the United States put to death in 1. Supreme Court had ruled it unconstitutional in 1. The original execution day was set for November 1. After several stays of execution – one of which was stopped, then overturned to proceed – Gilmore finally ran out of patience with the ACLU’s attempt to get him off of death row, saying, “They always want to get in on the act. I don’t think they have ever really done anything effective in their lives. I would like them all — including that group of reverends and rabbis from Salt Lake City — to butt out. This is my life and this is my death. It’s been sanctioned by the courts that I die and I accept that.”According to the BBC, “In his closing words, one of the judges emphasized that Mr Gilmore should take responsibility for insisting that his own execution go ahead. Among other people who have rights, Mr Gilmore has his own. If an error is being made and the execution goes forward, he brought that on himself,’ said Judge Lewis. Within an hour of the ruling Gary Gilmore was dead. The execution took place in a converted prison cannery in front of around 2. A hood was placed over his head, a target attached to his T- shirt, and the five- man firing squad took aim and shot from behind a screen.” Gilmore’s last words were, “Let’s do it.”In speaking with Dezeen, Dan Wieden said, “And for some reason I went: ‘Now damn. How do you do that? How do you ask for an ultimate challenge that you are probably going to lose, but you call it in?’ So I thought, ‘well, I didn’t like ‘Let’s do it; so I just changed it to ‘Just do it.’ I showed it to some of the folks in the agency before we went to present to Nike and they said ‘We don’t need that shit.’ I went to Nike and [Nike co- founder] Phil Knight said, ‘We don’t need that shit.’ I said ‘Just trust me on this one.’ So they trusted me and it went big pretty quickly.”Read Full Article.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
October 2017
Categories |